2026 Information Reporting Will Be Different: 5 Questions Tribal Leadership Should Be Asking This Fall

By Colin Brien, Tax Attorney, LL.M. in Taxation

For tribal casinos, January should be the month information returns are prepared and filed—not the month reporting problems are first discovered. That makes October and November two of the most important months in the 2026 information reporting cycle.

Incomplete tax documentation, improperly characterized payments, and reporting systems that are not aligned with the IRS’s new requirements can create significant challenges during filing season. Identifying and addressing these issues before year-end allows casinos to resolve potential reporting problems while there is still time, rather than attempting to correct them under filing deadlines.

For 2026, that year-end review is particularly important because casinos are confronting significant changes at the same time: new reporting thresholds, changes to the information returns themselves, and the transition from FIRE to IRIS.

The question tribal leadership should be asking this fall is therefore not simply, “Are we ready to file?” It is:

“Have we reviewed the data, documentation and reporting decisions that will ultimately support those filings?”

IRIS Changes the Filing Environment

Under the legacy FIRE environment, certain problems with payee data could remain largely invisible during electronic filing and surface later through IRS notices.

IRIS creates a different operating environment. IRIS applies business-rule validations to information returns as they are processed. Depending on the issue identified, a return may generate a reportable error, while other errors—or errors exceeding applicable thresholds—can cause a submission to be rejected.

For tribal leadership, this is more than a filing-system change. Information reporting relies on data originating across accounts payable, gaming operations, procurement, vendor onboarding, tax and other functions. An error identified during filing may have originated months earlier when a payee was documented, a payment was coded, or a reporting determination was made.

The Financial Impact of Reporting Errors

There is also a financial reason to identify these issues early.

For information returns required to be filed in 2027, the penalty for failing to timely file a correct information return is $60 per return when corrected within 30 days after the required filing date, $130 per return when corrected after 30 days but by August 1, and $340 per return when corrected later or not correctly filed.

If a failure is due to intentional disregard, significantly higher penalties can apply. For many information returns, the penalty is the greater of $690 per return or 10% of the amount required to be reported correctly, with no maximum penalty. Separate penalties can also apply to incorrect statements furnished to recipients.

Across a significant reporting population, what begins as a data or documentation issue can quickly become a financial issue.

The objective is not to focus on penalties. It is to identify problems while there is still time to address them.

Start With the 2026 Reporting Population

One of the most useful steps a tribal casino can take now is surprisingly simple: run a preliminary information reporting population.

Using year-to-date payment data, the organization can identify vendors, contractors, prize recipients and other payees that may require information reporting. The objective is not to prepare final returns early, but to identify the expected population and determine where further review is required.

For 2026, the first step is to make sure the casino is not applying 2025 reporting rules to 2026 payments.

On the accounts payable side, the general reporting threshold under Section 6041 increased from $600 to $2,000 for many payments beginning in 2026, including common reporting categories such as rents and nonemployee compensation. The change does not apply uniformly to every category—for example, the Form 1099-MISC reporting threshold for royalties remains $10.

The gaming floor is also affected. For 2026, the Form W-2G reporting threshold for bingo and slot machine winnings increases from $1,200 to $2,000, while the threshold for keno winnings increases from $1,500 to $2,000. Other wagering categories have their own requirements, including rules that may require winnings to meet both the applicable dollar threshold and a 300-times-the-wager test.

The 2026 information returns themselves have also changed. Forms 1099-NEC and 1099-MISC now contain new fields for cash tips, Treasury Tipped Occupation Codes and qualified overtime compensation. Although these fields may not apply to many casino payees, the revised return layouts still need to be incorporated into the casino’s data mapping and reporting process.

Casinos therefore should not simply roll forward their 2025 reporting logic, system settings, data mapping or expected reporting population. Both accounts payable and gaming operations should confirm that the 2026 rules and reporting requirements have been incorporated into their processes.

That review should include testing actual year-to-date data against the 2026 return layouts to confirm that required information can be extracted and mapped appropriately. For casinos using a third-party provider, management should similarly confirm that its existing data can be mapped into the provider’s 2026 reporting requirements.

Review the Documentation and Reporting Decisions

Once the preliminary population has been identified, the casino should determine whether it has the documentation necessary to support how each recipient is being treated.

For domestic payees, this generally begins with Forms W-9 and the corresponding vendor data. Missing documentation, inconsistent names and TINs, questionable classifications and differences between tax documentation and vendor master data can then be identified and addressed.

The review should identify not only missing information, but also payments for which the proper tax treatment has never been affirmatively determined.

Foreign recipients should be part of that review as well. Casinos may encounter foreign persons both on the gaming floor and within accounts payable. Foreign patrons can be subject to the nonresident alien withholding and Form 1042-S reporting rules, while foreign vendors can raise questions involving the type and source of income, Forms W-8 or 8233, as applicable, withholding, treaty considerations and Form 1042-S reporting.

Simply applying 30% withholding does not necessarily complete the analysis.

The broader question for both domestic and foreign recipients is:

Does the documentation on file support the tax treatment actually being applied to the payment?

What Should Happen Before Filing Season

The review does not need to become a year-end project that competes with filing season. A simple timeline can keep the process manageable:

  • October and November: Run the preliminary reporting population, review Forms W-9, W-8 and 8233 and other supporting documentation, identify unresolved reporting and withholding questions, test the data against the 2026 reporting requirements, and begin obtaining missing or corrected information from recipients.
  • December: Resolve remaining exceptions, incorporate year-end payments, confirm that the 2026 reporting rules and return layouts are reflected in the reporting process, and perform a final data validation.
  • January and filing season: Prepare and furnish the required returns, submit the filings through IRIS, and review IRS acknowledgments and any reported errors.

The goal is to move investigation and remediation into the fall so that filing season is focused primarily on completing the returns and addressing true year-end changes.

Five Questions Tribal Leadership Should Be Asking Before December

Tribal leadership does not need to become expert in the mechanics of information reporting. It should, however, expect management to be able to answer five basic questions:

  1. Have we identified our expected 2026 reporting population using the new reporting thresholds and current-year payment data?
  2. Do we have appropriate Forms W-9, W-8, 8233 or other required tax documentation supporting how our domestic and foreign recipients are being treated?
  3. Have we identified data, documentation, withholding or payment-characterization issues that need to be resolved before year-end?
  4. Have we tested whether our source data can be mapped into the 2026 Forms 1099, W-2G and 1042-S requirements and successfully submitted through IRIS?
  5. Have responsibilities been clearly assigned for preparing and reviewing the returns, monitoring filing acknowledgments and resolving any errors?

If leadership cannot confidently answer all five questions, that does not necessarily mean the casino has a compliance problem. It does indicate that additional review may be warranted.

Assess Your Current Reporting Process

InfoReporting Solutions has developed a complimentary Tribal Casino Compliance Self-Assessment to help tribal casinos evaluate their current information reporting processes and identify areas that may warrant additional attention.

The assessment addresses tax documentation, withholding, information reporting processes and the transition to IRIS.

Take the complimentary Tribal Casino Compliance Self-Assessment at:
https://www.inforeportingsolutions.com/self-assessment.html

January Should Be for Filing, Not Finding Problems

The transition to IRIS is often discussed as a technology change. For tribal casinos, the larger issue is whether the information supporting their returns has been reviewed before filing begins.

October and November provide an opportunity to review domestic and foreign payee documentation, resolve payment-characterization and withholding questions, account for the new 2026 reporting thresholds and return requirements, and test the data that will support the filings.

By January, the focus should be on completing and submitting accurate returns—not determining for the first time who should be reported, how payments should be treated, or whether the documentation and data supporting those decisions are sufficient.

For tribal leadership, the question this fall is straightforward:

Does management know who the casino expects to report, have support for those reporting decisions, and know that its data can produce the required returns?